|
| |
To Convert, Or Not To Convert?
That, is the Question.
|
The conversion between RGB and CMYK modes is often
avoided by PhotoShoppers who are just starting out in color correction. And
no wonder! The Internet is rife with warnings about the awful
things that converting your RGB image to CMYK will do.
There is a grain of truth to this concern, for graphically
created images that contain saturated colors . For these
"artificial" images, converting
to and from CMYK is a death knell for bright colors. Because
photographs have less saturated colors than graphic images, this
"fear of converting" is usually unfounded for those
images.
First, let's give the devil his due, and check out the
types of problems people run into when converting from RGB to
CMYK. Graphic artists specialize in creating non-photographic,
"artificial" images, and they need to know if their
work is destined for the RGB web or the CMYK printed page.
In particular, it is easy to create artwork with very pure reds,
greens, and blues that do not carry well into CMYK.
Converting a pure RGB Blue to CMYK is as bad as it gets.
Check it out:
figure 1
The good news for photographers (as opposed to graphics
artists) is that 99.9% of the time you won't be seeing
this purity of blue in a photograph.
|
Here's a "real"
blue, taken from the skies of Hawaii on a clear day.
Note: Next
time you're outside on a beautiful day, look at the sky.
Does it look like the pure blue in figure 1, or this blue?
|
|
converted
to CMYK and back again, gives ....
|
 |
|
Note: Although
I haven't included them in this table, real red
and green will also survive the journey to and from CMYK
very nicely, thank you.
|
figure 2
So your photographs will not have this conversion problem,
and with the examples that follow, I hope to show you that
they can be converted to and from CMYK color space one or more
times, with impunity.
The important example, for you, is the first one you will
do yourself using your own image.
Will CMYK mode alter your photographs unacceptably?
The experiment to answer this question is this: convert
your favorite image to CMYK mode and see if you like the way it
looks. Then convert it back again and see if you still like
it. If your answer is yes, then the wide and wonderful :-)
world of CMYK color correction is open to you!
(note: if you are using PhotoShop
6 or later, and if your colors gray out on you in CMYK mode, set
your profile intent to Relative Colorimetric instead of Perceptual.
PhotoShop 5 appears to be permanently set to Relative Colorimetric
mode.)
More important than the numbers, though, is to look at
the large version of each image and see if you can detect any
differences between them.
See the color
settings used for these examples
|
|
Example 1
shadow detail
image converted using PhotoShop 5.5
(click on any image to see more detailed results) |
|

|

|
|
original |
1 rgb-cmyk cycle
|
10 rgb-cmyk cycles |
|
Example 2
color
image converted using
PhotoShop 6
|
 |

|

|
|
original |
1 rgb-cmyk cycle
|
10 rgb-cmyk cycles |
|
Example
3
blue sky!
by popular request, blue sky! |
 |

|

|
|
original |
1 rgb-cmyk cycle
|
10 rgb-cmyk cycles |
Yes, But...
Why use CMYK?
This is really a discussion for another web page. Meantime
here are a couple of things that may intrigue you. You may
alter cyan, magenta, and yellow without unduly altering objects
in your picture that do not contain these colors. The K
channel acts as an anchor that makes it possible to alter the
colors of your image very aggressively, without changing the overall
brightness of the image, or unduly modifying neutral colors.
You can
directly control shadow detail by changing the K channel. The K
channel is a better place to do your sharpening for two reasons: 1) it
contains the important detail of your image, and 2) it cannot introduce
artifacts. Finally, CMYK is more intuitive: any kid who has mixed a blue
crayon and a yellow one to get green
already knows how CMYK colors mix together. But
I want to use RGB to get that
blue
into my photographs
You still can, if your images are destined for the web,
or other RGB medium. Just correct in RGB as you always did.
If your images are going to be printed, though, you are going
to have to compromise on your blues, and there is no better or
more correct color space in which to perform that compromise than
CMYK. Note: see my new
article, which uses a new CMYK space to address this concern
more fully - mgr.
But
my printer accepts only RGB data!
This is a valid concern. Unless you are printing to a Postscript
Laser printer, or other CMYK device, PhotoShop will convert your colors
back to RGB before sending them to the printer. Doesn't this undo
all the good benefits you had from working in CMYK? The answer is
no - as you can see in the examples, the conversion back to RGB does not
significantly degrade the image data. RGB, with it's wider gamut,
is a fine pipeline for sending your CMYK data to the printer. But
wouldn't we like to
send CMYK data directly to the printer?
Yes. If this were possible, we could print an absolutely
pure, shining yellow that would make
an RGB CRT monitor turn green with
envy. We could also simulate a press more accurately.
This really has nothing to do with the extra power we already
get by using CMYK as our working color space.
I Still Don't Buy It, and will continue to color
correct in RGB
Well, thanks then for your willingness to read this far.
If you don't see the benefits of color correction in CMYK,
perhaps you will tune in again when I add a web page of examples where
color correcting in CMYK gets better
images, more easily, than RGB.
CMYK capabilities run deep within the PhotoShop,
and resulted in more software work for almost every tool and filter
supplied by Adobe. In a way, CMYK mode is like a car that you already paid for - so
c'mon, let's go for a spin! |

© 2003-2004
Michael Russell, All Rights Reserved
Visit
Curvemeister
|